Saturday, February 14, 2009

When did life become so complicated?

Just a personal note today.

So really, when did life become so complicated?  It seems the older I get the more complicated life becomes.  Perhaps I'm not relying on God enough?  In my best Mel Brooks movie line impersonation, "Why am I asking you?".  I dunno.  I guess I just need to vent a little.  If it's not office politics or national politics, it's family politics.  Ugh.  

When I was younger I thought life was hard.  Doing homework every night as a child.  Junior high with all the awkwardness of going through puberty, then senior high trying to figure out who I was.  Then adulthood arrives as well as kids of your own and then your trying to figure it all out again.  Then your children become adults and your parents start needing the same care your children once did.  At what point does life become easier?  So when does the answer finally arrive?  

So I will go on, trying to figure life out and find the answers to lifes questions.  

Friday, February 13, 2009

The real cost of the stimulus/porkulus?

From the Heritage Foundation.  $3.2 TRILLION!!!!  Woof.

Monday, February 09, 2009

Obama administration on a political land grab?

It sure looks like it.  They are taking the census out of the Commerce Department and bringing it into the White House.  Sure looks like a good way to pad their territory.  Remember, the census is used to redraw districts.

Change someone can believe in?

Sunday, February 08, 2009

The folks over at Barron's make a very good argument. One I agree with. While we all played a part, the Government meddling in the free market is the biggest cause. The article can be found here.

Here are a few Key Paragraphs.

The government's meddling got us into this mess.

CONTRARY TO A VIEW POPULARIZED DURING THE 2008 presidential election season, the current economic crisis was not the result of deregulation.

The Bush administration made many mistakes, but deregulation was not one of them.

Not only was there no major deregulation passed during the past eight years, but the Bush administration and a Republican Congress approved the most sweeping financial-market regulation in decades.

The bipartisan Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in 2002 to prevent corporate fraud and restore investor confidence after the collapse of Enron and WorldCom. It failed to prevent the accounting fraud and influence-peddling scandals at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And even after those scandals were widely understood, regulators sent Fannie and Freddie back into the market to continue buying subprime loans, lending and borrowing with implied taxpayer backing.

Across the government, the Bush administration supported new regulations that added almost 1,000 pages a year to the Federal Register, nearly a record. If this is insufficient regulation, it's hard to imagine a scope that would be effective.

We are in this mess largely because critical thought and moral judgment have been subordinated to the politicization of our economy, resulting in regulatory gaps and excessive controls of the wrong kind.

Today's problems have their roots in programs and financial instruments that shifted the locus of moral responsibility away from private individuals and institutions to wider circles that were understood to end with a government guarantee. Heads of the top banks and financial institutions could approve substandard home-mortgage underwriting -- prone to increased default -- because those loans could be securitized by Wall Street and sold off to investors or to government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), with no likely recourse to the financial institution of origin.

Our present crisis began in the 1970s, during the Carter administration, with passage of the Community Reinvestment Act to stem bank redlining and liberalize lending in order to extend home ownership in lower-income communities. Then in the 1990s, the Department of Housing and Urban Development took a fateful step by getting the GSEs to accept subprime mortgages. With Fannie and Freddie easing credit requirements on loans they would purchase from lenders, banks could greatly increase lending to borrowers unqualified for conventional loans. In the name of extending affordable housing, this broadened the acceptability of risky loans throughout the financial system.

Hat Tip to Hotair.